Re: [PATCH 1/1] spi: altera: Add empty implementation of setup_transfer callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 05:50:52PM +0200, Pelle Nilsson wrote:
> On 2015-04-09 17:40, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Why is the callback mandatory if an empty implementation is OK?

> Ask the author of spi-bitbang. :-)

What I'm trying to suggest is that you're perhaps fixing the wrong
problem - make the callback optional if there's a good reason for it.
Why is this patch the best fix?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux