> On 07.04.2015, at 05:01, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I believe the bcm283x have 2 types of SPI controller. There is 1 > instance of the HW that this driver controls (SPI0), and that has CS0, > CS1. There are two instances of a different SPI HW block (SPI1, SPI2), > and those each have CS0, CS1, CS2. At least, that's my interpretation of > the table that shows the pinctrl module's per-pin alternate function values. Yes and no - SPI1 and SPI2 are a totally different beasts as these are "auxiliar devices" that have 2x2 word fifos, no DMA and minimal interrupt support and use a distinct register layout compared to SPI0. See BCM2835 Arm Peripherials page 20-27 for details. Essentially these are intended to get used for low speed devices or devices that run short transfers (<4-8 bytes) So these devices would need a totally separate SPI driver, which this driver does not and can not handle... > Should that be an error? Not being able to find the gpiochip implies the > code can't manipulate the CS lines at all, I think? Will add an dev_warn_once and contine without optimizations - the code still does check for the cs_gpio, so we would run without it? It could just be a rename of the pinctrl driver that would trigger this. You want it as an error? Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html