On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 07:35:37PM +0200, Martin Sperl wrote: > > On 06.04.2015, at 19:29, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm not seeing any particular complexity here. Can you be more explicit > > please? > I just see the high-possibility of bitrot for something that is IMO better > moved to a modified device-tree config. Requiring every system to update the DT to specify information that we can already get easily (and using a less readable format in that update) doesn't seem like a clear win for me...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
