On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 03:03:50PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > This can be easily worked around (and probably why it never was an issue) if > the OF and SPI tables are kept in sync but I don't know if that is a hard > requirement for all use-cases (e.g: a SPI driver that is DT only?). I'm not sure I see that as an interesting use case, it seems better to have drivers usable without DT and it's trivial to do so. > I'm sending an RFC patch [1] to know what you think about it. > > Thanks a lot and best regards, > Javier > > [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/127 > [1] > From a7cd35209a597a578df6c801e5ff7b63b584bf3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:31:04 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH RFC] spi: core: report OF style modalias when probing using DT We already have a perfectly good way of sending patches.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
