Re: [PATCH 8/8] spi: sirf: make DMA transfer mode optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:14:17PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:

> i have no strong technical reason for this as the benefit is not
> always technical. you know....the commit log has provided the reason
> for this patch.
> the difficulty for me is maintaining the difference between mainline
> and local codes, but if we have to maintain two copies,  we can.

OK, well I think that's best though it would be better if we were able
to understand what benefit your customers believe they are seeing here
and hopefully address it in a better way.  Doing this sort of thing with
Kconfig options is not great, especially when you start trying to build
kernels that work with more than one board.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux