On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 09:07:04PM +0200, David Wood wrote: > On 6 August 2014 21:04, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 08:53:41PM +0200, David Wood wrote: > > ... > > That was purely to ensure that there is no hidden use through a macro > > defined elsewhere, not a suggestion for a real patch. > > > > Guenter > > I also managed not to notice that I had in fact shown that the fs.h > definitions were the opposite of those in the spi driver, so it would > in fact be significant if they were swapped. > See it positively: There is someone out there doing an excellent job of forcing various kernel maintainers to have a close look into areas of the kernel they would otherwise never look at. In addition to that, we all gain valuable knowledge on how to validate patches. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html