> The current plan I think is to convert all platforms to use DT > or ACPI so they get the right data from tables passed by the > platform. I'm a bit puzzled about why Intel wants to support the > non-ACPI non-DT case again. If we have to support this case anyway, > what good will ACPI do us on those platforms? Because some industries move very very slowly so still don't believe in requiring ACPI or ACPI capable operating systems. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Enable DMA binding through device name
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Enable DMA binding through device name
- From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:45:14 +0100
- In-reply-to: <5237362.DJsH7MtqlU@wuerfel>
- Organization: Intel Corporation
- References:
- [PATCH] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Enable DMA binding through device name
- From: Kweh Hock Leong
- Re: [PATCH] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Enable DMA binding through device name
- From: Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [PATCH] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Enable DMA binding through device name
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Enable DMA binding through device name
- From: Arnd Bergmann
- [PATCH] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Enable DMA binding through device name
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH/RFC V8 1/1] clk: Support for clock parents and rates assigned from device tree
- Next by Date: [PATCH 0/2] spi-orion: one fix and one improvement
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Enable DMA binding through device name
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Enable DMA binding through device name
- Index(es):
 |