On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 08:53:09PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 03/16/2014 07:07 PM, Axel Lin wrote: > >Now I'm thinking if it is ok to use master->max_speed_hz as transfer speed when > >xfer->speed_hz > master->max_speed_hz. And it should be handled in spi core. > >I'm sending a RFC patch now. > That is an acceptable alternate solution for me. That's what I'd expect, take the maximum possible given the available constraints.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
