On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:19:07AM +0100, Michael Grzeschik wrote: > Second, the driver has "per se" nothing to do with SPI, beside it needs > a clock and data line to transfer an image to the FPGA. (One way, > therefor: passive). It needs to use some SPI controller to do that. Even > the SPI Bitbang driver. Because of this, it depends on the SPI > framework. Lots of drivers use SPI but they sit in the relevant frameworks rather than in the SPI framework. > It is actually not more than that. I took the spidev character device > driver as reference implementation. Any Idea where to put this driver > instead. Like I say somewhere where it sits with other FPGA programming stuff (if that's what it does) would be my first thought.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
