Hi Magnus, On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On thing stuck out a bit with the bindings. I can see that you specify >>> both fifo size and use the SoC suffix for the r8a7790 and r8a7791 >>> bindings. Isn't that a bit of redundant information there, if we know >>> that the SoC is r8a7790 or r8a7791 then can't we simply put that >>> information in r8a779x_data above and perhaps keep the binding >>> simpler? Perhaps same thing applies to other properties as well? >> >> "renesas,tx-fifo-size" and "renesas,rx-fifo-size" are part of the existing >> bindings, so I'm a bit reluctant to change these. >> Hmm, since the original bindings didn't specify the default values, >> I could make them chip-specific, though. > > Thanks, yes I think treating the "renesas,tx-fifo-size" and > "renesas,rx-fifo-size" bindings as optional and allow us to rely on > chip-specific default values makes sense. > >> The only other property is "num-cs", which can have any value if you >> start using the generic "cs-gpios". > > I see. It looks to me that such a setting is board-specific, so what > is a sane default in the SoC DTSI? You seem to have it set to "1" > today, but if the board is supposed to override it anyway then do we > need to set it? > > Anyway, "num-cs" is a minor detail so no need to bother about that too much! In v2, I'll drop the "num-cs" from the dtsi, so it will default to the driver's default (which is 1, for the simple case of using hardware controlled CS). Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html