On 19 February 2014 16:10, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:20:07PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > >> Also note that, Russell has already applied the corresponding part in >> the amba bus (patch 1) > > Why would this depend on an AMBA patch and if it does surely the two > need to be merged together somehow? There are no immediate dependency, sorry for confusion. I just wanted to highlight that the amba has converted to the new SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS. It means the amba bus' runtime PM callbacks are available for CONFIG_PM. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 06/17] spi: pl022: Let runtime PM callbacks be available for CONFIG_PM
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] spi: pl022: Let runtime PM callbacks be available for CONFIG_PM
- From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 19:02:54 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20140219151040.GH2669@sirena.org.uk>
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi-topcliff-pch: Transform noisy message to dev_dbg
- Next by Date: Re: [RFT][PATCH v3] spi: clps711x: Refactor to use core message parsing
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 06/17] spi: pl022: Let runtime PM callbacks be available for CONFIG_PM
- Next by thread: [PATCH V2 07/17] spi: pl022: Don't ignore power domain and amba bus at system suspend
- Index(es):
 |