On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:36:07AM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote: > If during a SPI transfer with len larger than PCH_MAX_FIFO_DEPTH and the > IRQ handler happens to be called when the transmit FIFO is already empty, > and SPSR_FI_BIT is set consequently, the message > "spi_master spi32766: pch_spi_handler_sub : Transfer is not completed" > is spammed to the systemlog, because tx_index has already increased > further due to the next bytes to be written. This case is uncritical as > new bytes have already been written. When you say "spammed" does that mean "printed once" or "is continually printed"? I'd have assumed the latter in which case it might be better to go as low as _vdbg() or even remove the message entirely if it's not possible to suppress it entirely.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
