Hi, On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 15:25 +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 08:09 +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > > > From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > SPI transfer lenght should be a power-of-two multiple > > of eight bits. > > Please re-check for "lenght" typos in subjects and commit logs > (code comments appear to be correct already). Thanks, will correct them. > > > The commit message still confuses me. You don't check that the > length of an SPI transfer has a power-of-two length in bytes. > > Instead what the check implements is IIUC > - pad "odd" bits-per-word settings before the check to full 1/2/4 > byte length specs (this is the power-of-two thing) > - the total length of the SPI transfer cannot be empty (which I'd > consider an optimization, not a violation, and may need a > separate discussion) I am not sure that I understand this one. I will say "the total length of the SPI transfer _should not_ be empty". There is no check for this currently. > - the total length of the SPI transfer must be such that each > "word" must be provided within a full 1/2/4 byte entity, with > padding bits if the bits-per-word is "odd" > > Is this a misunderstanding on my side? A terminology thing? To > me, the "SPI transfer" is the total payload and may have any > arbitrary length. What you check for is a constraint on the > transfer's length derived from or based on the "word length" > ('word' in SPI context). > > So the code may be appropriate, yet the description may need an > update, to not have the next person ask the same questions again. > I just forgot to update commit message. Will try to be more careful next time. Regards, Ivan > > virtually yours > Gerhard Sittig -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html