On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:23:32PM +0800, Barry Song wrote: > so could this copyright change be after one of the coming three? Yes, it's totally fine to update it when you make changes.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [PATCH 02/13] spi: sirf: update copyright years to 2014
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] spi: sirf: update copyright years to 2014
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:28:22 +0000
- In-reply-to: <CAGsJ_4wVkDgq8pgFHLf0X1nGZ2UKe_GKWDZ-3GQXB36ufFPDLQ@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
- References:
- [PATCH 02/13] spi: sirf: update copyright years to 2014
- From: Barry Song
- Re: [PATCH 02/13] spi: sirf: update copyright years to 2014
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH 02/13] spi: sirf: update copyright years to 2014
- From: Barry Song
- [PATCH 02/13] spi: sirf: update copyright years to 2014
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] spi: Use list_last_entry at appropriate places
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] spi: Remove duplicate code to check chip_select
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/13] spi: sirf: update copyright years to 2014
- Next by thread: [PATCH] spi: fsl-spi: Convert to let spi core validate xfer->bits_per_word
- Index(es):
 |