On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 09:04:23AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jookia, le jeu. 04 juil. 2024 17:02:14 +1000, a ecrit: > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 08:57:14AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Jookia, le jeu. 04 juil. 2024 13:10:05 +1000, a ecrit: > > > > More and more sighted developers want to remove CONFIG_VT > > > > > > Where is that raised? > > > > It's not raised, but it seems to be a goal that's been around for a while. > > Every year a reddit post comes out by someone testing CONFIG_VT=n and > > showing how much better it's getting, > > Then people can set =n, that's all good for them, it doesn't necessarily > imply removing the code. > > > without mentioning it breaks speakup. The VT subsystem is also > > apparently not actively developed. > > A lot of Linux code is not actively developed :) > > > > > without adding accessibility support. > > > > > > Was that explicitly expressed? > > > > No, but that's what will happen at this point. > > If nobody raises the concern, sure. So it's just a matter of raising the > concern. I'm a little rattled from everything in userspace breaking because developers see unmaintained ramps and replace them with stairs. Is the kernel better about this? > > Samuel Jookia.
