Hi, Which synth do you use? Thanks, Okash > On 29 May 2017, at 13:08, John Covici <covici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > OK, I will test as soon as I can. > > On Mon, 29 May 2017 05:50:33 -0400, > Okash Khawaja wrote: >> >>> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 06:38:39PM -0400, John Covici wrote: >>> I just have one question -- how did it work with the old serial i/o >>> system? >> In main.c, handle_cursor_read_all calls spk_get_index_count which calls >> spk_ttyio_in_nowait or spk_serial_in_nowait depending on whether TTY or >> old serial i/o is in use. So the difference is in spk_serial_in_nowait >> as the layers above that are identical. spk_serial_in_nowait returns 0 >> when there is no data on rx. spk_ttyio_in_nowait immitates that but due >> to the signedness bug, it was returning 0xff instead of 0 when there >> is no data. >> >> With the fix, now both serial i/o and TTY stacks should have same >> behaviour. > > -- > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: > How do > you spend it? > > John Covici > covici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
