On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Okash Khawaja, on mar. 23 mai 2017 09:30:34 +0100, wrote: >> Here's quote: >> >> "It doesn't deal with the case of a user opening a port that's also kernel >> opened and that would need some locking out (so it returned EBUSY if bound >> to a kernel device of some kind)." > > Ah, ok, so that doesn't exist yet and needs to be added. Something like > a flag added to the tty structure, which is set and cleared when opening > and closing the device from the kernel. Right that sounds good. I can test it out on my side and then we can plan what to do with the patch. Okash _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
