> On 20 Feb 2017, at 21:52, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Okash Khawaja, on lun. 20 févr. 2017 21:49:31 +0000, wrote: >> Keeping spk_ttio_out() as it is also means that it mirrors >> spk_serial_out behaviour more closely while having few side effects, >> i.e. restarting of TTYs. > > Actually, spk_serial_out does have the side effect of restarting TTYs > etc. on error, that's done by the spk_wait_for_xmitr() call. That's > actually one of the reasons why I was thinking that spk_ttyio_out should > be doing it. Ah okay. Right in that case it's actually better now because that side effect will at least be explicit. Thanks > > Samuel _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
