I'd be interested in hearing your opinion of cuneiform. I have gotten
much better results with tesseract but it could be that I didn't fiddle
with cuneiform enough. My experiments showed that tesseract gave better
results "out of the box" as it were. So then I spent a lot of time
tweaking my tesseract parameters. But maybe if I'd spent that amount of
time on cuneiform, I'd have gotten even better results.
On 11/03/2015 10:19 AM, Cheryl Homiak wrote:
Thanks. I did try another file and it worked in botyh cuneiform and tesseract so I think the two files I tried were an anomaly or it was a rotation issue. I haven't compared to see which package did the best job but it doesn't hurt to have both of them.
--
John Heim, jheim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 608-263-4189, skype:john.g.heim,
sip:jheim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
