As said before, arch is explicitly made to be simple, and for users that
want to play with it and know enough to do this. Arch is not for the
masses, unless someone installs it and prepares before.
W dniu 22.09.2015 o 10:06, Tony Baechler pisze:
OK, fine, but here's the thing. As long as most people (yes, there
are exceptions) want a live desktop, I can't recommend Arch. I've had
a few people tell me privately that they won't even consider Arch for
exactly this reason. If it's a choice by the Arch developers, that's
too bad as most people are turned off by this.
I haven't seriously looked at Gentoo in about 10 years, so if they do
have a live desktop image, I don't know about it. I haven't seen it
on the various mirrors. If there is such an image, please send me a
link and I'll evaluate it. Similarly, if there is a simple installer
which actually guides you through the process like Debian or FreeBSD,
I'll take a look. I like Gentoo in concept, but I can't recommend it
for the masses due to the above issues. There was going to be a fork
which was going to address some of these issues, but I don't know
whatever became of it.
On 9/21/2015 5:05 AM, Michał Zegan wrote:
The thing about no live desktop is an explicit arch decision, could
even say
it's a feature, same about gentoo, but gentoo has, or did have at some
point, a live image.
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
