Has anyone thought of contacting the Fedora project to see what interest can be generated that way? Anything that goes into RHEL has to go through Fedora first, so that might be a better place to start. On 3/29/2013 11:09 AM, Tony Baechler wrote: > Umm, why? She only works with Fedora as I understand and I'm not even > sure if the Speakup Modified Fedora is still current. It would be > good if she could get her organization and the AFB involved though. > > No, I think the only way this will change is if at least a few people > complain loudly to the ACB and lflegal.com. Even then, it could take > years. I agree that LPI seems better, based on the books I've seen. > I personally would be willing to support a movement to make RHEL > accessible, but since I don't use it and don't have to, I'm not a good > candidate to complain. > > For those of you living in California, the CCB is also a good choice. > They are very strong and have taken on several big companies. Yes, > the ACB and CCB require membership, but it isn't expensive and you can > call first to see if they're interested in helping. http://ccbnet.org/ > > On 3/29/2013 5:25 AM, Glenn wrote: >> One person I would ask about this is: >> Janina Sajka >> Her address is: >> janina at rednote.net >> Glenn > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
