Has any decision been made yet regarding licensing? I understand from the original post that licensing was still undetermined. Personally, I'm a big fan of the unlicense[1] or cc0[2] which can be used for software, unlike most of the CC licenses. On the other hand, if you still wish to retain copyright on the code while preserving software freedom, GPL 2 or later is probably best, unless there's a specific reason i.e. linking against incompatibly licensed code, that GPL can't be used. Generally though, the whole GPL and linking thing usually works the other way, where you can't link against a GPL licensed library with a non-GPL licensed application, so I don't see this as a problem in this case. Just some thoughts, hopefully there's something useful here. [1]: http://unlicense.org/ [2]: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ~Kyle http://kyle.tk/ -- "Kyle? ... She calls her cake, Kyle?" Out of This World, season 2 episode 21 - "The Amazing Evie"
