That's exciting we're that much closer to full Kernel inclusion. I do have one question though; is the serial support for recent kernels still broken? I know the last time I tried my speakout synth, it still wouldn't work. I have tested it with other serial communications and used it on another machine where I have a very old kernel so the synth, port and cable are good. It just seems ironic that even though software synthesis has become increasingly popular and convenient, the one thing that speakup used to require and stood out with was serial support which now doesn't work in many cases. If I understood that code base better, I could try and debug it/fix it. On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 09:25:15AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > William Hubbs, le Thu 07 Oct 2010 19:15:47 -0500, a ?crit : > > But, I don't think that is a good > > idea, because it means that we would have to maintain two > > branches in the repository from now on and make sure that all changes to > > master went to the other branch as well. > > That's precisely what git is really good at: having branches and merge > on a regular basis. > > That being said, we still probably need to establish a workflow to > maintain a modular speakup and the staging speakup. > > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup