As I am planning (its finding the time) to re-record my install tutorials I will probably cover these. The question is, you've removed two of the advantages of the GRML install, how much value might there be in redoing the GRML installation of Arch? I can think of a couple of advantages, what do others think: * Wireless with GRML may be easier, I can't remember if the Arch install CD has wireless, but grml-network is really good for setting up the network. * GRML may support more soundcards (I mean as well as drivers, I mean it may unmute more correctly). * If you like reading docs, etc while installing or may want other tools, GRML has lots of great stuff on the CD. I personally feel the Arch installer is the best way to go as it guides you through the process and so helps stop you forget a step. So long as people feel there really is a need for the installing from GRML I will try and support it, so please let me know if you want that. Michael Whapples On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, Chris Brannon wrote: > Hi list, > It's finally here, as promised! > If you don't know about TalkingArch, it is my Speakup-modified ArchLinux > install CD. Actually, "CD" is a bit of a convenient misnomer. > The images are suitable for both recordable CDs and USB flash drives. > They are so-called "hybrid" .iso files. > You can download it here: > http://the-brannons.com/tarch/ > > I made a couple of improvements. First, it is now available for both > the i686 and x86_64 architectures. Second, I now include a brltty package > on the CD, for those who have braille displays. > > -- Chris > >
