On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, William Hubbs wrote: > I just pushed some changes to the repository which I am hoping will fix > some issues that I have heard about. > > There was an issue with the way flush was being handled that should be > fixed. Luke, I believe you reported that reviewing the screen had very > slow response times. I can't reproduce this here, but I am guessing > that it is related to the first issue, and hopefully it is fixed. Not. Identical problem. So maybe it wasn't flush? Does my preemption model matter for this? Something else: double review keys (numpad 5 numpad 5, for example, to spell a word) stop working all together. I should note that I am testing with 2.6.18. If you think it is relevant for me to test with a later version, I will, but currently later versions break loopmount encryption on my system, which is not acceptable for anything other than testing, so I haven't been using them. Luke
