duo boot systems...revisited, i think?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi there,
This is crystal clear, and very helpful.
i will write off list to ask the couple of additional questions I have.
Indeed I use  wordperfect among other DOS programs and have  several years 
of  work invested in them and in my three dos screen readers, not to 
mention tthousands in hardware, so it will 
be a separate drive until I have a reason to do otherwise.
Will ask  my remaining questions off list, and thanks for the clear 
answer,
Karen

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Kerry Hoath wrote:

> Personally I don't care how badly you spell your messages, however there
> seems to be some confusion on the list exactly what you want and what you
> mean. I'll try summarize your options, and see if that makes anything
> clearer to you.
>
> Feel free to write to me off list if it would help.
>
> A dual core processor or core duo or core 2 duo (depending on how new it is)
> is a processer that has 2 cores in it. It is capable of executing 2 tasks at
> once (in theory) and is a handy thing to have when you have a high workload
> on your computer or you are virtualizing see below.
>
> Obviously a dual boot system is a system that can boot into Linux or Dos.
> Usually the decision is made at boot time as to which operating system to
> boot; usually with a boot loder of some kind.
>
> Linux boot loaders include grub, lilo and others. You can also put a loader
> in the master boot record which will allow you to hold the alt or shift key
> at boot and pick which partition to boot.
>
> There are also loaders that you can load from dos that can start linux,
> however I am not sure how they handle modern kernels and initial ramdisks.
> syslinux and loadlin are two that spring to mind.
> An initial ramdisk is a set of files and scripts that are loaded into
> extended memory and control is passed to them by the kernel.
> This initial ramdisk is responsible for loading drivers for the root file
> system, key hardware drivers and starting up raid or volume management
> systems.
> The boot loader needs to load this file (usually 4-12 megabytes large) into
> extended memory above the kernel and pass control to the Linux kernel.
> This blows dos away and gets you running Linux.
>
> Most people use a Linux boot loader to load this up as they tend to work
> better at doing this. These loaders can also boot dos; however it is best to
> keep dos on the first drive, (bios drive 0x80) and Linux either on a
> partition of that drive or on the second disk.
>
> If running 2 operating systems on the one box you have a couple of options
> as you have surmized.
> 2 disks with an operating system per disk, or 1 disk with multiple
> partitions.
>
> I am over-simplifying here in order to make this understandable however when
> you partition a disk a table in the first sector of the disk tells you how
> much disk is allocated to each operating system.
>
> Think of it as slicing up a cake into different sized pieces, you allocate
> diferent sized pieces depending on how hungry people are.
>
> You put dos on the first partition of a disk (usually) and Linux on one or
> more partitions after this.
>
> Install dos (or Windows 95 dos not sure which one you mean) first,
> on a partition that does not take up all the disk, then put Linux on another
> partition or two.
>
> I usually have /boot on a primary partition which contains the boot loader,
> and the rest of Linux in an extended partition, (or in dos terms a set of
> logical drives in the extended partition)
>
> It's up to you how to do things; however this might help clarify or confuse
> things a bit more.
>
> virtualization is a method of running one operating system inside another on
> a computer.
> You can run Linux inside a virtual machine inside Linux, or Windows or other
> operating systems.
> You can't run anything virtually inside dos because dos does not run in
> protected mode and virtualization is not possible in this environment.
>
> You can run virtual Linux in windows, or virtual windows in Linux.
> This allows you to run both operating systems at once; saving you a reboot
> to switch between them.
> Linux has a program called dosemu, which when correctly configured allows
> dos to run inside Linux. Quite a lot of stuf runs under it including some
> games and certain screen readers so it is worth a look.
>
> There's nothing I can do under dos that I can't do under Linux, and unless
> you have certain applications like word perfect or similar you might find
> yourself using Linux more than you use dos.
> I ended up deleting my install of dos about 6 months after installing Linux
> in 1993.
>
> Regards, Kerry.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karen Lewellen" <klewellen at shellworld.net>
> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 7:41 AM
> Subject: Re: duo boot systems...revisited, i think?
>
>
> I am sorry that my spelling is such an issue for you.
> As expressed I wrote that post in the middle of the night.
> Not shared however is that I learned that my 20 year old nephew died of a
> heart attack in America, and i was more than  a bit  distracted.
> Others seemed to understand my meaning,
> Indeed my goal is to run DOS and Linux on different hard drives, and boot
> into Linux as needed.
> Is that clear enough for you?
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, luke wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>>
>>> Not running windows, but will hunt virtual options for DOs.
>>
>> There are no virtual options for DOS, at least not for running virtuals
>> under DOS.  A virtual machine is one operating system which runs in an
>> emulated hardware environment under another operating system.  Linux and
>> Windows can run virtual  DOS machines, but DOS can not run virtual
>> anythings.
>>
>> Now, for DOS under Linux, DOSEmu is probably a better solution than
>> virtualization.
>>
>>> now that I think of it though, a reboot is no major factor, any way to
>>> create
>>> a . bat file run in dos that will reboot the system into Linux as needed
>>> into
>>> Linux without requiring the duo processor?
>>
>> What do you mean by "duo processor"?  If you are talking about multiple
>> core processors, those have nothing to do with duel boot (duel not duo).
>>
>> Duel boot, is when you can boot into one of many operating systems which
>> are installed on your machine, usually in separate hard drive partitions,
>> or on separate hard drives.  That has no connection what ever, either to
>> multiple processors, multiple cored processors, or duo anythings.
>>
>>> I have been dragging out this business long enough, but hardware and
>>> talent
>>> has been the issue.  I do not want yet another hardware factor because I
>>> have
>>> to find a duo processor.
>>
>> Again, what is this "duo" processor, and why do you need it?
>>
>> Luke
>> _______________________________________________
>> Speakup mailing list
>> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
>> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux