Cool, Gregory. I'll check this out and report back. It does sound like what I'm looking for. Thanks. Gregory Nowak writes: > Ok, I think I see what you're going for. > > In the below examples, I assume that you have an external ip, 1.2.3.4, > which you want to route to 192.168.0.1, and a second external ip, > 5.6.7.8, that you want to route to 192.168.0.2. I also assume that > your network device connected to the dsl modem is eth0. > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 --source 1.2.3.4 -j DNAT > --to-destination 192.168.0.1 > > and > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 --source 5.6.7.8 -j DNAT > --to-destination 192.168.0.2 > > Note 1:, I know I'm using incorrect number ranges for the external ip > addresses. > > Note 2: This might have line wrapped, so be sure to check for that if > doing cut and paste. > > Note 3: I obviously haven't tested this, but it should work in theory, > as far as I understand iptables syntax. If you get errors, let me or > the list know, and I'll try to resolve them. Hth. > > Greg > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 08:24:37AM -0500, Janina Sajka wrote: > > Hi, Sina: > > > > Didn't remember the term multihoming. I'll check that out. > > > > So, here's my situation. My ISP provides me multiple ip addresses, if I > > want them. I want to take advantage of that in a way I think is > > appropriate. It would be easy if I just used the external, routable ip > > addresses directly--one for each machine perhaps. > > > > But, I want to keep my internal, nonroutable scheme intact. For one > > thing, I have more machines than routable addresses. For another thing, > > I'd like the freedom to use the routables by function, rather than > > specific machine, meaning that I might migrate internally from one > > machine to another at some point, without changing the externals. > > > > So, how do I do that NAT? Let's say I have four IP addresses. They're > > discontinguous. Internally, I have seven or eight machines (depending on > > the day). > > > > Here's what I know I can do. I can route traffic arriving on address A > > port 80 to machine A-Prime port 80, and route traffic arriving on > > address B port 80 to machine B-Prime. > > > > But, can I route traffic arriving on address C, whatever port, to > > machine C-Prime? Without specifying all the particular ports one at a > > time? Or as some kind of gargantuan range like 1-32767? > > > > > -- > Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- Janina Sajka Phone: +1.240.715.1272 Partner, Capital Accessibility LLC http://www.CapitalAccessibility.Com Marketing the Owasys 22C talking screenless cell phone in the U.S. and Canada--Go to http://www.ScreenlessPhone.Com to learn more. Chair, Accessibility Workgroup Free Standards Group (FSG) janina at freestandards.org http://a11y.org
