FreedomBox

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello all,

I'd like to respond to some of the recent comments about FreedomBox and 
the company behind it.

First, Linux is now one of the available operating systems on the trial 
registration form.  We apologize for the inconvenience.

In response to Kenny:  Where on Earth did you get the idea that we sell 
personal information or track web browsing activity?  We have never done 
anything of that sort, and I find it insulting to suggest that we would. 
  As consumers, I and the other people at Serotek hate spyware, just 
like everyone else, so why would we spend time developign something that 
we knew our users would hate?  We prefer to use our limited resources to 
develop innovative products and services that users will enjoy. (Hint: 
I'm currently Serotek's only programmer.) So I'd seriously like to know 
what made you think that we sell personal information or track your 
online activities, because there isn't an ounce of truth there.

We did change our minds about making the browser available free of 
charge, but for good reason.  Would you actually use the FreedomBox 
browser at no charge, with Festival or Flite, if it was available?  As a 
consumer, I wouldn't consider it worthwhile to save a mere twenty-five 
dollars to put up with one of those awful text-to-speech engines, for 
all or even some of my web browsing.  Considering, as Cheryl pointed 
out, that FreedomBox gives you access to sites that aren't otherwise 
accessible under Linux, I'd say it's worth the twenty-five bucks.  It's 
certainly the most inexpensive adaptive technology product of its kind 
that I would consider usable by the average user.  If you want to 
continue using Lynx with Speakup, that's fine.  Don't get me wrong; 
Speakup is a good product, but we're in the twenty-first century now, 
and Lynx is way behind the times by any measure.  Anyway, as a business, 
we just didn't think it made sense to spend thousands of dollars worth 
of programming time to support one of these undebatably inferior 
text-to-speech engines.

As for Lorenzo's suggestion that we're no better than Freedom 
Scientific, I find the comparison ludicrous.  As I said before, for 
twenty-five dollars, our software is extremely affordable.  For only 
$9.95 a month, you get access to a wealth of content and other services, 
as well as painless software updates.  And we offer all of this under an 
operating system for which Freedom Scientific has done nothing.

In response to Sean, we do understand and respect the culture of the 
Linux community.  Yes, FreedomBox is like an AOL for the blind; and just 
as AOL has been paying more attention to intermediate and advanced users 
in recent years, so are we.  FreedomBox 2.0 may not yet have the 
flexibility of some applications that you're used to, but we're working 
on it; and as I stated earlier, we do respect your privacy.  Also, as I 
hinted earlier, we have taken Linux seriously when other adaptive 
technology companies have not.  In the face of opposition from others in 
the company, Mike Calvo has personally fought for the development of the 
Linux port of FreedomBox.  He has also permitted and even encouraged me 
to contribute back to open-source software.  Have we done some things 
that free-software purists don't like?  Sure, but we can't please 
everyone; and I think we've done more good for the blind Linux community 
than most open-source efforts directed at this community in recent 
years, including my own.  Is paying a fair price in return for a good 
product and service too much to ask?  Even Linus Torvalds uses 
proprietary software when he believes it's the best tool for the job, so 
I don't think usage and development of proprietary software is contrary 
to Linux culture.

If you have any questions, comments, or concerns about the points I've 
made here, please feel free to share them on this list.  I want to set 
the record straight and clear up any confusion that remains about 
FreedomBox and Serotek.  I hope this message has helped to accomplish that.
-- 
Sincerely,
Matt Campbell
Lead Programmer
Serotek Corporation
www.freedombox.info




[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux