Hi Chuck, et al, I have 2.6.11.6 compiled on my laptop, running with no problems. When I upgraded from 2.4.x, some time ago, I used the 'make oldconfig' with my .config file from 2.4.x to the first 2.6.x kernel i did (can't remember which one it was). There were a lot of new features to add from 2.4.xx but it retained all the old settings from 2.4.x into the new 2.6.x without any problems. Despite the installation instructions to not put the kernel in the source tree, I have always put a symlink in '/usr/src/linux' pointing to the root of the kernel tree, as unpacked by bzip2. Maybe I'm violating something here (someone will hopefully point it out if I am), but it works for me. the only other thing I can think of, would be to make sure that you have the up-to-date packages as described in the '/usr/src/linux/README' file, eg binutils, libs, etc. HTH, --terry On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:45:22PM -0400, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote: > Hi John, > > I did the "make config" since this was the first 2.6.X kernel I had > attempted, and there was an enormous amount of new options in it. > > No, my make bzImage died with the same error as the make modules > command, the "include/config/MARKER" error. I may be dealing with a > faulty SW 10.1 upgrade, I suppose. > > > -- > The Moon is Waning Crescent (12% of Full) > "Things are in the saddle, and they ride mankind." Ralph Waldo Emerson > Visit my download site at http://www.mhcable.com/~chuckh > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- Name: Terry D. Cudney Phone: (705) 422-0039 E-mail: terry at wasaga.dyns.net Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like... having a peeing sectionin a swimming pool. Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
