because I do not have a choice Luc, it is my only other ftp location. I was supposed to have a Linux machine months ago to forestal this, but the person has not held up their end, and clearly has no plans to do this. It was not until ken almost lost everything i have up here that i realized something must be done. I am not discussing this any further. No zip of this data. Why are you insisting upon trying to force this issue? btw, I did not read all of your post. I am very busy at work and only opened it at all out of respect for you. Karen On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Luke Davis wrote: > Tell me this: if they are so very incompetent, why are you trusting your data > to them at all? Also, data corruption, of any kind, is more likely to happen > to two gig of data, than it is to a far smaller singular file. In fact, with > a single file, you could always make two copies. In fact, once you get it > over there, you can decompress it immediately, and keep an uncompressed > version. It is only the transfer of that much data, about which you should > be concerned. > > Then again, maybe you should just buy the extra bandwidth from Shellworld, > and not worry about it. > > You can do what ever you wish, of course, but you asked for advice, and you > now have to live with receiving it. > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Karen Lewellen wrote: > >> Its my reality and my experience with those who run this site. Whatever >> my reasons, such is my choice. >> I have all the experience with those running this service to know that i >> would rather not risk it. >> better decompressed and safe than compressed and flawed in a way i do >> not discover until after the fact. >> The risks are both small and I have chosen the one I prefer. >> I do not have to give you my reasons or even make them clear to you. you >> may disagree all you wish but It will make know difference to my final >> choice. >> Consider Luc, Ken knows what he is doing and has lost every scrap of data >> up here once before, and almost did it again over the weekend. He knows >> what he is doing and has done this. I am not going to chance this with >> people who openly admit they are not that informed about Linux, and >> install even lynx incorrectly. >> Karen >> >> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Luke Davis wrote: >> >>> This is true. She seems to be worried, that they won't be there, on an >>> old version of Redhat. >>> >>> As I said earlier--she seems to have an irrational fear of >>> compression--in short: a fobia: an irrational fear, not based upon >>> reality. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Gregory Nowak wrote: >>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> Even if they're using freebsd, tar, bzip, and bzip2 should still be >>>> there. These are not gnu/linux-specific utilities. >>>> >>>> Greg >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Speakup mailing list >>> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca >>> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Speakup mailing list >> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca >> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > >
