My original message was quoted below yours', and mine. What I said, was that *maybe* there was a blanking method that did not recover all space. I then said that both fast and full blanks, in my experience, did recover all space. On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Gregory Nowak wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Luke, > > if I recall, you had said that you recover all the space only with a > full burn, since you may not be able to recover all of it with a fast > burn. You are wrong there (if that's what you actually had stated), > because you can recover all the space with either burn, fast or > full. If I had your original message to look at, I could be more > specific. > > Greg > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:31:10PM -0500, Luke Davis wrote: >> On which point was I wrong, Greg? I said that I believed that both types >> recovered all of the space, and that somebody should correct me if I was >> wrong. You corrected me, said I was wrong, but then concurred with my >> statements. >> > > - -- > Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFBfx1l7s9z/XlyUyARAuA5AKDZFCIm9oznRGwTg8oHgRSHzMWJwgCgiaZ3 > tTABOAIeml7SKomY1BdvRsU= > =HuQd > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >
