-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. While we all have to use in-line signatures to post at least to this list, and while the old in-line signatures are deprecated in favor of pgp/mime, Steve has indicated that he uses in-line signatures when sending to this list, but uses pgp/mime when sending to everyone else. Also, in my private correspondence with Thomas, I noticed that he seems to be using pgp/mime as well. Given the fact that I was specifically asked by someone to use in-line signatures instead of pgp/mime when sending to them privately, combined with the fact that pine doesn't seem to support pgp/mime from what Chuck has said, as well as like it or not, I at least have to communicate with windows users who get freaked out whenever they see an attachment they didn't expect, and who don't use gpg/pgp themselves, I was wondering if the majority of us on this list use pgp/mime when mailing privately, or if folks use in-line signatures instead? Since this type of a thread is bound to result in a bunch of replies which all may not benefit from, folks are welcome to reply to me privately. I would however be very interested in getting feedback about what everyone here using gpg does regarding the above issues. Thanks. Greg - -- Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAZBxk7s9z/XlyUyARAq3eAJ4yn9ZGmj/uhZKB3lEesLlVeg8NVgCfbB8P CoLcFTQ6HH6YesKQxgb0pAY= =3bkc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
