-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hmmm, interesting. Chuck's messages, as well as everyone else's messages auto verify just fine here. Using mutt 1.4.2I. Greg On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 07:25:09AM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: > Yes, while using Mutt 1.5.6, copying up the previously built gpg.rc, > the whold ordeal turned out to be rather painless. Not bad for > someone who has never dealt with encryption and signing of e-mails > before. Another interesting deal; I notice that your messages, Chuck > have to be verified manually where Mutt automatically verifies the > others sent from Greg Nowak, Alex Snow, myself, and a couple others. > As far as I know, they are choosing the inline approach to make it > onto this list. When I receive your messages, I need to do a <esc> P > from Mutt to do the verification. At that point, verification is > successful and then looks like the others. That Mutt command "looks > for traditional signatures". Any way, glad the learning curve is > through pretty much and I can begin finding practical uses for it:). > - -- Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAYwdn7s9z/XlyUyARAoGyAKDWYn8hp70qTKCj7KXxT3lR5Ve3AwCfUhu/ zYLOPO1ga6MZHlEUTJ9SF2Q= =k0kZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
