-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 If network raid is possible it would be extremely slow especially over the internet if that's what you're planning on. the ideal way to do it would be something like gigabit ethernet lan but that kit is expensive. On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:57:23PM -0500, Igor Gueths wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all. I'm going to need this type of functionality sometime in he > future. And I can't use NFS, because its too centralized. Does anyone > know if its currently possible to add network filesystems to a RAID? > Because if so, what I'd like to implement is a system where all the > networked filesystems are synchronized to each other. So in other words, > any changes made from my machines here gets proppogated to the rest of > them since they're all seen as 1 disk. And I'd also have to make it so > Bind returns A records in random order for propper load balancing. > Speaking of Bind, I posted this a while back but never got any replies. > Is rrset-order supported in Bind-9.2.3RC4? Thanks! > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFAYLLDNohoaf1zXJMRAhTHAJ0QXk/2DHF/kh/MuyV9JQ+yFGxYQQCgrfvc > XZL9I0H+bIviuor+a1Mxj30= > =6sbn > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup - -- Always borrow money from a pessimist; he doesn't expect to be paid back. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAYLsS9XVrM3ri110RArZ6AJ4yNK5UAkhMPgUo07VxzdtskW3ibQCgicKE N6lv8zJuK5tQ46WbVf+r0/4= =5OZP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
