ram question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sometimes, if you change the order of the chips, it will all be there.
Glenn
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gregory Nowak" <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 2:54 PM
Subject: ram question


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all.

I just installed a 256M ram chip in my server. This gives me 256M of
ram in bank1, 128M in bank2, and 128M ram in bank 3, which should
compute to a total of 512M of ram.

However, in my dmesg output, I get:

383MB LOWMEM available.

The board can support a total of 768M of ram, so the system should be
seeing the full 512M of ram, but it doesn't look like this is the
case. This is a 100MHz FSB board. The chips are all sdram, and are
pc133, pc100, and pc100 respectively. 

Does anybody see what I'm missing? Should I maybe enable the high
memory option in the kernel? The kernel is 2.4.25. Please let me know
if I should provide more info. Thanks in advance as always.

Greg


- -- 
Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAX1Kb7s9z/XlyUyARAuyoAKCdw4VSNDfcedEcgVkbC45+YHjDrQCgivgX
YRgsn6N4UXradnzSVeosiGQ=
=/uLt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup





[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux