-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 the two editors I use most often with speakup are emacs and nano. nano is a pico clone but it's opensource, has more features, and the cursor tracking works a lot better then pico. I don't use emacs as an editor more often I run stuff like tnt under it and it works quite nicely. Slackware does infact install two emacs binaries one with x and one without. it really doesn't matter which one you use but if you didn't install the x series (bad idea since some packages are broken without it) then you need the emacs with no x support. On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:50:20PM -0500, Kyrath. (AKA Rob) wrote: > Hi, I'm slowly poking around my system and have been looking at the editors that are currently installed. > 1. Is there a particular editor that works very well with speakup? Or alternatively, editors that don't work well at all? > 2. Does speakup completely support the use of emacs, or does emacspeak need to be used instead?. > Also, it appears that there are 2 versions of emacs on my system; emacs with-x, and emacs no-x. I assume that the x version should be uninstalled and only use the no-x version. Right? > 3. BTW, are there any word processors for linux that run under console mode? I know there is open office, but that is for the x-windows system. Right? > Thanks for any suggestions > -- Rob > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > - -- Always borrow money from a pessimist; he doesn't expect to be paid back. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFASUYo9XVrM3ri110RAtrbAJ0azvkXIAR6RlMiLKnMlwCk/Eq0BQCfe7oe V38slswwv3TgJQewI4OesJY= =Rr2J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
