I think that the upstream speed was decreased to improve the download speeds. Glenn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Snow" <alex_snow@xxxxxxx> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup at braille.uwo.ca> Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 2:33 PM Subject: Re: broadband cable throughput quality -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 the quality of cable connections from what I've seen is pretty good. the speeds for downstream are for the post part quite nice. the only thing that could be improved is increasing the upstream by a little (certain isps only give 128k or less). On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 02:43:55PM - -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Setting the propaganda aside what kind of quality for cable modem > downloaads is actually offered? If the quality is less than effective > what needs to be done by users to get it improved? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup - -- Note that if I can get you to "su and say" something just by asking, you have a very serious security problem on your system and you should look into it. -- Paul Vixie, vixie-cron 3.0.1 installation notes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA6Ftw9XVrM3ri110RAlMpAJsHn4XI4NNAeoQh1e0CvoMdSS16pwCeN/vj b/8G6s8G6RuDyoYa3eJ7wQo= =Ux1T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup at braille.uwo.ca http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
