-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Well, frankly, festival sounds like garbage, worst then the Braille 'n Speak or accent in my opinion. When I was using it with gnopernicus, I found myself spending more time on understanding what festival was saying, then I did on actually using gnopernicus and using gnome. Yes, I know, festival is GPL software, and we should be happy that we have a GPL software synth at all, but Hynek did ask for comments, so I'm posting my own in an attempt to answer his question of what is wrong with festival in my opinion, and not in an attempt to start a flame war (smile). Greg On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 06:51:01PM +0200, Hynek Hanke wrote: > What's the problem with Festival? I mean, what should Festival do better > so that you could use it instead of Dectalk or Eloquence? Or the other > hardware synthesizers. > > Of course, this is also a question for others. > > Regards, > Hynek > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > > - -- Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA5aJB7s9z/XlyUyARAsrpAJ9BUKbQRfp7+jR1Cs+wnafT416+pQCgqJul Gs3CPrEzzIp9jr1vpwzoxmg= =uWFA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
