how would one tell mutt to use inline signatures as opposed to ataching them? this is the only thing stopping me from using gpg. On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:18:57PM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > My guess would be that you are attaching your signature, as > opposed to using an inline signature, and this list rejects > messages with attachments. I sign my messages too, but not with > an attached signature. Pine automatically uses inline signatures. > The choice is controversial. Pine cannot easily handle attached > signatures, and other mail programs have trouble with inline > signatures. > Chuck > > > On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Igor Gueths wrote: > > > Hi all. Is it me or all PGP-signed messages being dropped? Because I > > sent a signed message to another mail account of mine, and I got the > > message fine. However when I send one to speakup at braille.uwo.ca, it > > seems my messages don't get proppogated. I know they get successfully > > delivered because of the success messages indicated by Courier in > > syslog. Does anyone know what's going on here? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > - -- > The Moon is Waning Gibbous (57% of Full) > In a world without Fences or Walls no one needs Windows or Gates. > My home page is now at http://www.mhcable.com/~chuckh > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iQCVAwUBQCwJ7DVdG8M9x9tGAQJNhwP/U3tg040F05CrH4IgfDK4q6o1EyT1GG7l > Lzg357WFKNAslscidgrMzBy20ptii4PwyIRf1qn4wLDUxk7uSIoQJ/VrUMZsco4B > 627G8yJ1n+7c8DIpMeClV5ewBRYfbtEqRZWSBsIJ7iggt8gqe2Z9/Tx+SsHk6oxH > ZzuiALBFZn8= > =2M45 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- Always borrow money from a pessimist; he doesn't expect to be paid back.
