Hi all,
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom and Esther Ward <tward1978 at earthlink.net> writes:
Tom> Hi, Igor. While it would be nice to see a free talking text
Tom> browser I am also not one to bite the hand off the developers
Tom> that are attempting to deliver a good web browser for the
Tom> Linux comunity. They could have just as well said Linux
Tom> users are not worth their time, and targeted only the Windows
Tom> platform, and then you would have nothing to complain about
Tom> as the windows platform is mostly closed source rather than a
Tom> few closed source apps that you get in Linux. Linux users
Tom> are so spoiled God forbid that someone try and sell them
Tom> something, or God forbid wait until Mozilla or epifany works
Tom> well with Gnopernicus. You know what sucks about the general
Tom> attitude on this list? The endless wining that not every
Tom> application on this Earth is not free open source, that the
Tom> entire world has not converted to his or her favorite Linux,
Tom> and the endless wining that someone has a different opinion.
Gee, Tom, you mean we're actually missing all that whine? May as well
put it in barrels, it might ferment into something good! <smile> I
agree. I may not think that the browser should remain proprietary,
but since it is, and since it works a Hell of a lot better than MSIE,
then frankly, I'm taking it! It does what I want it to do. I meets
my needs, and although I would like to see it in GPL, it isn't. Hey,
why don't you all complain to Microsoft that they should be GPL, if
they were, their problems would get fixed a lot sooner, but you know
that isn't possible. So, quit making barrels and barrels of whine,
and start using something that is good!
Ann P.
--
Ann K. Parsons
email: akp at eznet.net
WEB SITE: http://home.eznet.net/~akp
"All that is gold does not glitter.
Not all those who wander are lost." JRRT
