-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 imcom's interface is based on commands kind of like irc which may make it more complicated. centericq's interface is more menu driven but harder to use with speakup. It's really a persona.l preference. Imcom however only supports jabber from what I saw...while centericq supports a hole bunch of different protocols. On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:07:55AM -0400, Jes and guide dog Harley wrote: > Hi all, > Once I get my Linux box on line, I was wondering which would be the better alternative for instant messaging, center icq or i m > com? I've tried to install imcom but dpkg says something about me needing the python xml base which isn't installed. I wish Debian > woody 3.0 r2 came with the thing. Oh well. I would like everyone's opinions on this, please. > Thank you a lot. > Jes > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup - -- Sigh. I like to think it's just the Linux people who want to be on the "leading edge" so bad they walk right off the precipice. -- Craig E. Groeschel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAdr359XVrM3ri110RAodhAKCEBhKvNRO7U+DZSU4G+a5w7dl8EgCeLReJ EgT16zSQm2XZVjrwL6oaNRU= =JFbi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
