Hi all, <smiling> My objection to this particular missive of Kevin's is not the content but the method used. Shaun has delivered a rousing rendition of what the content of this post "apology" deserves. I shall not try to take away his thunder. How could I? That fresh, earthy, Australian tang is just what this documentation needs. No, my objection is to *anyone* who wanted his documentation taken seriously, daring to place *any* written material on-line or off without running a SPELL CHECKER!!! I mean "sinse" "specificly" "lisence"???? C'mon folks. If you're going to place yourself in line for firing from the Australian Militia, you sure as Hell don't need to ask for drubbing from The Rochester Grammarians Association. Now, I mean really, bad tactics, bad tactics. In short, this spam is utter and complete rot, deserving any and all criticism it gets! Ann P. -- Ann K. Parsons email: akp at eznet.net WEB SITE: http://home.eznet.net/~akp "All that is gold does not glitter. Not all those who wander are lost." JRRT
