On 10/14/03 4:42 PM -0400, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote: > Luke, > > While you are at it, what exactly is the difference between a > hard link and a soft link? The difference is that a symbolic (soft) link is a special file which contains the name of the file it points to. Symbolic links can work across file systems which hard links cannot. Hard links are simply references to the same inode by another name, but in every way besides the name they *are* the same file. Here is a sample "ls -l" that illustrates this. total 0 -rw-r--r-- 2 thomas thomas 0 2003-10-14 16:00 file1 -rw-r--r-- 2 thomas thomas 0 2003-10-14 16:00 hard1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 thomas thomas 5 2003-10-14 16:00 sym1 -> file1 In this example file1 is a regular file and hard1 is a link to it. The number 2 after the file permissions means that the file has two names linked to it and if we "rm" either file1 or hard1 that number will decrease to 1. A key point is that they are both references to the same file. The third entry sym1 is a symbolic link and is a different file altogether, but it contains the name of file1 and because the file system knows it is a link it will look for file1. I hope this doesn't muddy the waters too much and Luke's description is still more practical. -- Unix is a user friendly operating system. It just picks its friends more carefully than others. Thomas Stivers e-mail: stivers_t at tomass.dyndns.org gpg: 45CBBABD
