I have no comment to the below (you don't really say much). To what you said to Adam's response... I, personally, didn't think you were complaining, just reporting a bug, on something that was already due to be fixed. Now, whether that would have been or not (it turns out not, since it wasn't a problem), it was still, ecentially, known to be unusable. I don't think anyone needs to be taking offense at any part of this thing. Just some misunderstandings. On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Janina Sajka wrote: > These comments, Luke, are precisely what I took offense at with Adam. I > take the same offense here. And, I have pretty much the same response, > except more so. > > Luke Davis writes: > > From: Luke Davis <ldavis at shellworld.net> > > > > On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Janina Sajka wrote: > > > > > Adam Myrow writes: > > > > > > nip ... I remember Kirk saying to avoid CVS just before the web > > > > site went down. > > > > > > Now, what is this comment supposed to mean? > > > > Touchie, touchie!:) It sounds to me, that it means that CVS speakup is > > known to have all manner of bugs at the moment, and if you used it when > > the author says spesificly that you shouldn't, reporting bugs serves no > > real purpose. > > > > Now, of course, if you aren't using CVS Speakup, it is a whole different > > matter. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > -- Want a free month of internet access on a great ISP? Go here: http://www.tacticus.com/net/
