Configuration Files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Luke Davis wrote:

> On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Kirk Reiser wrote:

<snip>

> > What I mean is the fewer things you can do in kernel code the
better.
>
> I will leave this here, as the cardinal rule of design.  I am one of those
> who believes speakup probably shouldn't be in the kernel to begin with,
> but I do not trust my abilities even a fraction enough to tackle that
> perceived problem, and I am wavering ever so slightly as to whether it is,
> in fact, a problem.  Still, the above statement has the ring of moral
> authority with me, so worry not.

I assume, then, you're going to write a bios chip, for the same cost as
any other, that has speech onboard, so we don't need Speakup to be in the
kernel? (grin)

Good luck mate, I look forward to it.

-- 
Toby Fisher	Email: toby at tjfisher.co.uk
Tel.: +44(0)1480 417272	Mobile: +44(0)7974 363239
ICQ: #61744808
   Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
   See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux