Seems to me the problem is that the Linux text editors all use silly commands while WordPerfect has a well thought out and easy system of navigation and commands. On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote: > Seems to me that Word Perfect for Linux, if it existed, would > have the same problem that all proprietary software has: i.e., it > uses a proprietary format that assumes the availability of Word > Perfect for anyone wishing to work with the document. I know you > can make plain text files with WP, but why bother to use WP if > you want to make plain text files? What are the advantages of > Word Perfect for Linux that would be worth the limitations of a > proprietary file format? > > Or am I missing something? > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, jude dashiell wrote: > > > Only version of that I've ever run into came on infomagic disks and would > > need gnome or kde or some other form of x to run it. It's for that reason > > I'd not use wp under Linux or even have it take up disk space here. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > -- -- Charlie Crawford
