this is deffinitely over turnable. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cecil H. Whitley" <cwhitley@xxxxxxxxx> To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:20 PM Subject: anyone else? Hi, At this moment my chain has been severly jerked. So here's the scenario.... I went in on april 23 to find a new car. Got pre-approved and everything. Found a car that both me and my wife liked. Traded in my old car and we drove the new one home. I signed the contract. The title to the previous car was in my name, it was registered in my name, and it was insured in my name. On the new car loan capitol 1 (the underwriter) is attempting to require that I have a co-signer with a drivers license. The car will be registered in my name, insured in my name and titled in my name (once it is paid for), so why should I be required to have a person cosign the loan simply because they have a license? I can within the limits of my insurance policy have anyone I desire to drive the vehicle do so. I'm not making any sort of commentment that only she will drive it. So, has anyone else run into this? Is this not a discriminatory requirement since it has nothing to do with my (or hers) ability to pay? Bottom line, we are a single income family (mine) and so having her cosign isn't going to improve their ability to collect. Comments welcome! Cecil _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup at braille.uwo.ca http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
