Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
From: greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Gregory Nowak)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 16:22:23 -0500
In-reply-to: <007501c1fb7b$f7c0a030$91e03244@DAVIDPOEHLMAN>; from poehlman1@comcast.net on Tue, May 14, 2002 at 03:17:19PM -0400

Uhhm, to which message were you replying?
Greg


On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 03:17:19PM -0400, David Poehlman wrote:
> nope.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup

Follow-Ups:
- Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
  - From: David Poehlman

References:
- Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
  - From: Dawes, Stephen
- Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
  - From: Gregory Nowak
- Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
  - From: David Poehlman

Prev by Date: xwindows
Next by Date: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
Previous by thread: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
Next by thread: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux for the Blind] [Fedora Discussioin] [Linux Kernel] [Yosemite News] [Big List of Linux Books]

Powered by Linux