Why should it be up to the listowner to do this. Why can't people just be responsible? Is every one too lazy to change their client to plain text? Erik Heil said the following on Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:01:42PM -0400: > I totally agree. I vote for plain text instead of HTML. If this becomes a > problem in the future, it wouldn't be hard at all to implement a perl script > that stripts all HTML tags from incoming messages. Such a script would > obviously be implemented through Mailman. > Erik heil eheil at rcn.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ann Parsons" <akp at eznet.net> > To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca> > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:52 PM > Subject: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms' > > > > Hi all, > > > > Count me on Gena's side. Email is text and should never be confused > > with the web. The web is not a synonym for The Internet, much as some > > people would like to have you believe. > > > > I vote for text only. If you're a windows user, become an expert and > > send in plain text, please! > > > > Ann P. > > > > -- > > Ann K. Parsons > > email: akp at eznet.net ICQ Number: 33006854 > > WEB SITE: http://home.eznet.net/~akp > > "All that is gold does not glitter. Not all those who wander are lost." > JRRT > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- If you perceive that there are four possible ways in which a procedure can go wrong, and circumvent these, then a fifth way will promptly develop. Raul A. Gallegos - http://www.asmodean.net
