Right on Amanda. In today's world it's a sad fact that a lot of people use html messages. I remember last year when we were starting a mass email project to our subscribers the marketing team wanted to post out an html message with pictures and sounds. From the admin point of view we didn't like it because of the bandwidth and because not all of our subscribers use windows to read their email. Instead we proposed to send out the email in plain text with a link to a website that has the same things with the colors and sounds. It took a lot to convince marketing for this but it was done in the end. I still get a lot of email from windows users and in fact at work I have no choice but to use outlook 2k. In any case. The best idea is to configure your own mail agent so that unwanted headers are weeded out or just choose to not read html messages. I've written privately to people if I really wanted to see what they are writing to re-send in plain text and that is usually met with positive response. Like Greg I too use mutt and don't have any problems reading messages from windows users. Best regards. Amanda Lee said the following on Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:36:05PM -0500: > Yeah, I rarely agree with KW. But when is it that we as a bunch of > blinkies will stop living in somebody else's World? > > Best I can suggest is to get over it or not subscribe to any mailing > lists. I appreciate it when people don't use html in messages but by the > same token, I am not at liberty to dictate to them how they are to post > mail and from what medium. I've been using pine for years and I just > spoze that most of the nuisances are just that and they surely don't > mess-up my whole damn! day! ha! > -- If you are good, you will be assigned all the work. If you are real good, you will get out of it. Raul A. Gallegos - http://www.asmodean.net
